No, no, reality isn't both continuous and particular at the same time (as cladistics wrongly has got it)

Cladistics has obviously understood that reality is both continuous and particular in our conceptualization of it, but wrongly thinks that it is both at the same time (ie, conflates class with entity). Turned this way, conceptualization is actually paradoxically contradictory, ie, in practice infinitely recursive, which also Russell's paradox shows.

No, continuity and particularity has to be comprehended as two aspects of reality (arising with our conceptualization of reality), whereof continuity logically is situated either between or extending over particularity, but definitely not simultaneous, since it is paradoxically contradictory (ie, in practice infinitely recursive). Moreover, if reality indeed should have been infinitely recursive, as cladists obviously think it is, then change, like the process of dichotomous propagation that cladists "only acknowledge", should actually have been impossible. Cladistics is thus not only a fundamental misunderstanding, but also fundamentally self-contradictory.