When science turns into belief: cladistics and Higg's particle-ism

Cladistics and Higg's particle-ism do actually represent scientific breakdowns into belief. When the irrationality of reality frustrates scientists enough, they find ways to escape this frustration, and these ways do, unfortunately, always lead them into the belief they tried to escape in the first place, and are, also unfortunately, just as paradoxically contradictory as the beliefs they tried to escape are. These ways do thus just lead them from the ashes into the fire. Neither clades nor Higg's particle are consistent, but are actually paradoxes.

Scientists can't understand how their rational search for the truth led them to this frustration, which forced them to take the step to belief, but I can explain that it is because the explanation of this is simpler than their explanation of reality is. They simply can't see the forest because they look to close on the trees.

The fundamental problem is that reality has two aspects: pattern and process, and that this fact prevents us from finding a single truth, just as it prevents reality from finding a stable state. This fundamental fact is not something we can overcome, but something we have to accept. Unfortunately, it means that particle physicists will not find a smallest particle and that cladists will not find the tree of life. Both of them are convinced over the boundary between science and belief that their respective ideas are to be found, but, unfortunately, they're wrong. Neither of them is to be found. This I can claim with security, since if they could be found, then time would not be relative to space. My claim thus hangs on the fact that time is relative to space.

(However, independently of this fundamental rectifier, only my reasoning is totally consistent. Please, correct me if I'm wrong).