Cladistics is a "natural" confusion

Science acknowledges the fact is that there are two aspects of entities: pattern and process.

Cladistics distinguishes itself fundamentally from science by assumiing as an axiom that there is no difference between pattern and process.

Now, if cladistics indeed is correct, then it thus loses its foundation, since there is nothing to be no difference between, leaving cladistics with nothing but its contradiction.

Cladistics is thus fundamentally contradiction, that is, eternal division, or evolution itself.

Cladistics thus turns Darwin's discussion about evolution into evolution itself by denying the difference between pattern and process that conceptualization of reality rests on. This approach isn't "natural", as cladists assert, but possibly a "natural" confusion..