fredag 6 juli 2012
Why should biological systematics accept a premise that is impossible?
If the class clade indeed is consistent, then there must be single entities (ie, single biological species) that can be divided into clades. Exactly how cladists mean that such division is possible remains to be explained. Until cladists provide an explanation of this impossibility, their approach thus ought to be discarded. Why should biological systematics accept a premise that is impossible?
Etiketter:
biological systematics,
Cladistics,
evolutionary taxonomy
Prenumerera på:
Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar