What Russell's paradox tells us concerning realism (like cladistics)

Russell's paradox tells us that realism (ie, assuming that classes are real), like cladistics, is bound to end up in Russell's paradox. Classes are simply fundamentally paradoxically contradictory by being orthogonal.

Together, all of us have thus led realists to their ultimate Waterloo, ie, cladistics, by encouraging subjectivity. The process can be comprehended as a reaction against the scientific revolution, which, thus, surprsingly for realists, ends in a paradox. The scientific revolution thus has not been falsified, but just overturned by a movement that ended in paradox.

This is the situation we're in right now.  

Cladistic typology is the entrance to racism

Cladistics can't distinguish object and class. This deficiency is the generic entrance to racism. Cladistics is thus dangerous to humanity by being the "evolutionary", and thus seemingly scientific, entrance to racism.

I'm doing what I can to counteract this hole in science by trying to explain that this kind of application of the theory of evolution is consistently inconsistent, that is, contradictory. Cladists have simply got matters up-side-down. It is not classes that are real, but objects. Evolutionary scientists are just doing what we can to describe evolution consistently. We are not responsible for the total misunderstanding that is called cladistics. We have never claimed that classes are real. .